Are You Supporting the Person or the Sin?
“Tomorrow shall be a feast to the LORD.”
—Exodus 32:5
Aaron’s failure did not end when he made the golden calf.
That was only the beginning.
After fashioning the idol, Aaron built an altar in front of it and announced, “Tomorrow shall be a feast to the LORD.” The next morning the people brought offerings, sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play.
Wait. What?
Aaron did not merely allow the people’s rebellion. He organized it. He gave it religious language. He took something God had forbidden and attempted to make it look spiritual.
This is where reckless empathy eventually leads. First, Aaron abdicated his responsibility to lead. Then he enabled the people’s sin. Finally, he participated in the very thing he should have confronted.
Baptizing Rebellion
Aaron called the celebration “a feast to the LORD.” That phrase should stop us in our tracks.
He did not openly announce, “Tomorrow we are abandoning God.” Instead, he attached God’s name to what the people already wanted. He baptized their rebellion.
This is one of the dangers of compassion disconnected from wisdom. Once we become committed to protecting someone from discomfort, we begin adjusting our language to protect that person from conviction. Eventually, we can call evil good and good evil while convincing ourselves that we are simply being loving.
We may call gossip “processing.” We may call bitterness “having boundaries.” We may call cowardice “keeping the peace.” We may call shielding someone from every consequence “showing grace.” We may call refusing every uncomfortable correction “protecting our peace.”
The labels may sound compassionate. But changing a label does not change the heart.
Once we start compromising truth to avoid hurting feelings, we can end up participating in the very thing we were supposed to confront.
Refusing to Enable Is Not Abandonment
Some Christians hear a warning like this and swing toward the opposite error. They treat truth-telling as permission to be harsh, impatient, or cruel.
That is not biblical discipleship either.
Some of us have been wounded by people who used “I am just telling the truth” as an excuse to vent their frustration, establish their superiority, or control another person. Harshness masquerading as love can be every bit as destructive as Aaron’s enabling.
The difference is found in both motive and manner.
Are we speaking because we genuinely love this person, or because we are annoyed with this person?
Are we speaking with gentleness and humility, or with anger and superiority?
Are we willing to remain present after the hard conversation, or do we simply want to deliver a verdict and walk away?
Truth without love becomes cruelty. Love without truth becomes enabling. Biblical discipleship requires both.
We refuse to enable, but we do not abandon. We set boundaries while maintaining relationship. We pray. We listen. We remain available for honest conversation. We consistently point people toward what is good, even when they do not yet want to hear it.
We stay engaged while refusing to participate in destruction.
A Pattern for Truthful Compassion
What does that look like in an actual relationship? Consider five movements of wise, truthful compassion:
Sometimes that entire pattern can be summarized in one honest sentence: “I love you too much to watch you continue hurting yourself this way. I am not going away, but I cannot support a choice that is harming you.”
What This Looks Like in Ordinary Life
A parent may need to let a child experience a consequence rather than repeatedly rescuing that child from responsibility.
A friend may need to refuse to join another round of gossip, even when the gossip is presented as a request for prayer.
A small group leader may need to challenge someone who continually uses past hurt as permission for present bitterness.
A spouse may need to say, “I understand why this is painful, but I cannot agree that disobedience is the answer.”
A church leader may need to make a faithful decision that disappoints people rather than allowing the fear of criticism to govern the ministry.
And every believer needs at least one mature Christian who has permission to speak hard truths into his or her life.
None of these actions requires coldness. They require courage joined to compassion.
Aaron believed he could manage the situation by giving the people enough of what they wanted. But compromise never stays where we intend to contain it. The calf became an altar. The altar became a feast. The feast became open rebellion.
Sin does not become safer because we accompany it.
The goal of discipleship is not to make sure another person is never disappointed with us.
The goal is to help that person love, trust, and obey Jesus.
Is there a relationship in which you have confused support with agreement?
Is there a destructive pattern you have been helping someone maintain because saying no feels unkind?
Or have you used “truth” as an excuse to speak without gentleness, humility, and patient love?
Christlike discipleship neither joins people in the water nor shouts instructions from the shore. It moves close enough to help, remains anchored firmly enough to stand, and points people toward the only Savior who can truly rescue them.
This article was adapted from the sermon “Reckless Empathy,” based on Exodus 32, preached by Doug Modic at Cornerstone Bible Church.
—Exodus 32:5
Aaron’s failure did not end when he made the golden calf.
That was only the beginning.
After fashioning the idol, Aaron built an altar in front of it and announced, “Tomorrow shall be a feast to the LORD.” The next morning the people brought offerings, sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play.
Wait. What?
Aaron did not merely allow the people’s rebellion. He organized it. He gave it religious language. He took something God had forbidden and attempted to make it look spiritual.
This is where reckless empathy eventually leads. First, Aaron abdicated his responsibility to lead. Then he enabled the people’s sin. Finally, he participated in the very thing he should have confronted.
Baptizing Rebellion
Aaron called the celebration “a feast to the LORD.” That phrase should stop us in our tracks.
He did not openly announce, “Tomorrow we are abandoning God.” Instead, he attached God’s name to what the people already wanted. He baptized their rebellion.
This is one of the dangers of compassion disconnected from wisdom. Once we become committed to protecting someone from discomfort, we begin adjusting our language to protect that person from conviction. Eventually, we can call evil good and good evil while convincing ourselves that we are simply being loving.
We may call gossip “processing.” We may call bitterness “having boundaries.” We may call cowardice “keeping the peace.” We may call shielding someone from every consequence “showing grace.” We may call refusing every uncomfortable correction “protecting our peace.”
The labels may sound compassionate. But changing a label does not change the heart.
Once we start compromising truth to avoid hurting feelings, we can end up participating in the very thing we were supposed to confront.
Refusing to Enable Is Not Abandonment
Some Christians hear a warning like this and swing toward the opposite error. They treat truth-telling as permission to be harsh, impatient, or cruel.
That is not biblical discipleship either.
Some of us have been wounded by people who used “I am just telling the truth” as an excuse to vent their frustration, establish their superiority, or control another person. Harshness masquerading as love can be every bit as destructive as Aaron’s enabling.
The difference is found in both motive and manner.
Are we speaking because we genuinely love this person, or because we are annoyed with this person?
Are we speaking with gentleness and humility, or with anger and superiority?
Are we willing to remain present after the hard conversation, or do we simply want to deliver a verdict and walk away?
Truth without love becomes cruelty. Love without truth becomes enabling. Biblical discipleship requires both.
We refuse to enable, but we do not abandon. We set boundaries while maintaining relationship. We pray. We listen. We remain available for honest conversation. We consistently point people toward what is good, even when they do not yet want to hear it.
We stay engaged while refusing to participate in destruction.
A Pattern for Truthful Compassion
What does that look like in an actual relationship? Consider five movements of wise, truthful compassion:
- Listen carefully. Take the person and the pain seriously. Do not rush past what happened, minimize suffering, or assume that every struggle has a quick answer.
- Discern biblically. Ask what God’s Word says about the person’s desire, proposed response, and deeper heart. Feelings tell us something important, but they do not possess final authority.
- Speak truth gently. Address the person, not merely the problem. Speak with humility, recognizing that you also need grace, correction, and the transforming work of Christ.
- Set faithful boundaries. Do not lend your approval, resources, silence, or participation to something that is harming the person or dishonoring God.
- Remain present. Make it clear that your refusal is not rejection. Continue praying, listening, encouraging, and walking with the person toward repentance and restoration.
Sometimes that entire pattern can be summarized in one honest sentence: “I love you too much to watch you continue hurting yourself this way. I am not going away, but I cannot support a choice that is harming you.”
What This Looks Like in Ordinary Life
A parent may need to let a child experience a consequence rather than repeatedly rescuing that child from responsibility.
A friend may need to refuse to join another round of gossip, even when the gossip is presented as a request for prayer.
A small group leader may need to challenge someone who continually uses past hurt as permission for present bitterness.
A spouse may need to say, “I understand why this is painful, but I cannot agree that disobedience is the answer.”
A church leader may need to make a faithful decision that disappoints people rather than allowing the fear of criticism to govern the ministry.
And every believer needs at least one mature Christian who has permission to speak hard truths into his or her life.
None of these actions requires coldness. They require courage joined to compassion.
Aaron believed he could manage the situation by giving the people enough of what they wanted. But compromise never stays where we intend to contain it. The calf became an altar. The altar became a feast. The feast became open rebellion.
Sin does not become safer because we accompany it.
The goal of discipleship is not to make sure another person is never disappointed with us.
The goal is to help that person love, trust, and obey Jesus.
Is there a relationship in which you have confused support with agreement?
Is there a destructive pattern you have been helping someone maintain because saying no feels unkind?
Or have you used “truth” as an excuse to speak without gentleness, humility, and patient love?
Christlike discipleship neither joins people in the water nor shouts instructions from the shore. It moves close enough to help, remains anchored firmly enough to stand, and points people toward the only Savior who can truly rescue them.
This article was adapted from the sermon “Reckless Empathy,” based on Exodus 32, preached by Doug Modic at Cornerstone Bible Church.
Posted in Multiplication Moment
Recent
Archive
2026
January
March
No Comments